<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for M. Louisa Locke</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mlouisalocke.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mlouisalocke.com</link>
	<description>Author of the Victorian San Francisco Mystery Series</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:38:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Self-Published Authors Know Best by dustywhite</title>
		<link>http://mlouisalocke.com/2011/08/01/why-self-published-authors-know-best/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dustywhite]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mlouisalocke.com/?p=685#comment-475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GREAT ARTICLE!

I have been a published author since 1994, and a self-published author since 2004. Your article lays it out exactly as it is. I make a LOT more money self-publishing than I ever did with my publisher. I loved being published, and probably will go that route again, but the bottom line is control, real money in my pocket, and the love that Amazon gives me. Libraries and bookstores (my favorite hangouts) won&#039;t take my books. They already have enough, and they want Paris Hilton&#039;s dog&#039;s book (yes, it wrote a book and got published), Lindsay Lohan&#039;s memoirs, or someone who has been on Oprah. And let&#039;s not even start talking about returns. I work my a** off to reach my readers, but I know who they are. I help them personally. We have a special relationship I could not ever have if I could not speak to them in free lessons (from my websites, blog, and podcasts), help them on my private forums, friend them on Facebook. When I was published I lived in a vacuum. My first book was the #4 seller in my publisher&#039;s catalog but there was no interaction like I have now. I had no idea what was possible, or even who my readers were. How could I know what was important to THEM? I wish every trad. published author the very best. As for me, I know how to get out there and sell books. The pay is great, my readers are the best people on the planet, and I will give everything I can to them so they will stay with me for more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GREAT ARTICLE!</p>
<p>I have been a published author since 1994, and a self-published author since 2004. Your article lays it out exactly as it is. I make a LOT more money self-publishing than I ever did with my publisher. I loved being published, and probably will go that route again, but the bottom line is control, real money in my pocket, and the love that Amazon gives me. Libraries and bookstores (my favorite hangouts) won&#8217;t take my books. They already have enough, and they want Paris Hilton&#8217;s dog&#8217;s book (yes, it wrote a book and got published), Lindsay Lohan&#8217;s memoirs, or someone who has been on Oprah. And let&#8217;s not even start talking about returns. I work my a** off to reach my readers, but I know who they are. I help them personally. We have a special relationship I could not ever have if I could not speak to them in free lessons (from my websites, blog, and podcasts), help them on my private forums, friend them on Facebook. When I was published I lived in a vacuum. My first book was the #4 seller in my publisher&#8217;s catalog but there was no interaction like I have now. I had no idea what was possible, or even who my readers were. How could I know what was important to THEM? I wish every trad. published author the very best. As for me, I know how to get out there and sell books. The pay is great, my readers are the best people on the planet, and I will give everything I can to them so they will stay with me for more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Alternative to Blog Tours:  Two Week Vacations by shaunshelf</title>
		<link>http://mlouisalocke.com/2011/12/10/my-alternative-to-blog-tours-two-week-vacations/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shaunshelf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 20:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mlouisalocke.com/?p=791#comment-474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,
   I am a literal(not virtual) novice re tours of any description. My publisher is urging me to dip my toe in that particular water - for a fee, of course. I don&#039;t mind that; all knowledge has its value and therefore a price. I can pay it, no question, but will it be worth it? I have written three novels( a fourth in production), self-published last two, one of which has gone ebook with aforementioned publisher. She is very good, can recommend her. It&#039;s just that I am aged 77, been writing all my adult life in all media, with moderare success. Today&#039;s book world is becoming(to me) bewildering, not only on so many levels but in so many directions. Which to choose; obviously not many but a choice must be made if one is to maintain any momentum. Problem: at the nub of it all is the fact that I just want to write, not network or schmooze or massage someone else&#039;s ego, just so that they can reciprocate and make you feel good about yourself! I really wish someone would take me aside and tell me with all due seriousness, &quot;Hey, Shaun, dump that and that, stick with this one, don&#039;t waste your time on those there.&quot;  That&#039;s all. I suppose what is daunting me too is the realization that there is so much quality writing out there and opening up the world this way actually can shrink or diminish one&#039;s own apparent accomplishments. How can my puny efforts stack up against such worthy(and growing) competition? I mean, I don&#039;t even know if I am doing this right! I&#039;m sure someone will tell me though...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
   I am a literal(not virtual) novice re tours of any description. My publisher is urging me to dip my toe in that particular water &#8211; for a fee, of course. I don&#8217;t mind that; all knowledge has its value and therefore a price. I can pay it, no question, but will it be worth it? I have written three novels( a fourth in production), self-published last two, one of which has gone ebook with aforementioned publisher. She is very good, can recommend her. It&#8217;s just that I am aged 77, been writing all my adult life in all media, with moderare success. Today&#8217;s book world is becoming(to me) bewildering, not only on so many levels but in so many directions. Which to choose; obviously not many but a choice must be made if one is to maintain any momentum. Problem: at the nub of it all is the fact that I just want to write, not network or schmooze or massage someone else&#8217;s ego, just so that they can reciprocate and make you feel good about yourself! I really wish someone would take me aside and tell me with all due seriousness, &#8220;Hey, Shaun, dump that and that, stick with this one, don&#8217;t waste your time on those there.&#8221;  That&#8217;s all. I suppose what is daunting me too is the realization that there is so much quality writing out there and opening up the world this way actually can shrink or diminish one&#8217;s own apparent accomplishments. How can my puny efforts stack up against such worthy(and growing) competition? I mean, I don&#8217;t even know if I am doing this right! I&#8217;m sure someone will tell me though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Self-Published Authors Know Best by Writer Wednesday &#171; creative barbwire (or the many lives of a creator)</title>
		<link>http://mlouisalocke.com/2011/08/01/why-self-published-authors-know-best/#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Writer Wednesday &#171; creative barbwire (or the many lives of a creator)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mlouisalocke.com/?p=685#comment-473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] spite M.Louisa Locke  saying why Self-published authors know best, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m knowing more than anyone else, I&#8217;m just experimenting from my [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] spite M.Louisa Locke  saying why Self-published authors know best, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m knowing more than anyone else, I&#8217;m just experimenting from my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Self-Published Authors Know Best by Greever Williams (@GreeverWilliams)</title>
		<link>http://mlouisalocke.com/2011/08/01/why-self-published-authors-know-best/#comment-471</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greever Williams (@GreeverWilliams)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mlouisalocke.com/?p=685#comment-471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After going through the traditional publishing route for my non-fiction work, I was extremely disappointed with the bureaucratic and disorganized nature of the publisher I was working with. I felt like I was losing my voice in all the shuffle. For my fiction, I have firmly committed to go all indie. I recently posted my own declaration of self-reliance on my blog (linked above) if anyone is interested. I&#039;d love to read more about these kinds of decisions from other authors, especially those who have experienced the traditional route.  Thanks for sharing!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After going through the traditional publishing route for my non-fiction work, I was extremely disappointed with the bureaucratic and disorganized nature of the publisher I was working with. I felt like I was losing my voice in all the shuffle. For my fiction, I have firmly committed to go all indie. I recently posted my own declaration of self-reliance on my blog (linked above) if anyone is interested. I&#8217;d love to read more about these kinds of decisions from other authors, especially those who have experienced the traditional route.  Thanks for sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Self-Published Authors Know Best by Camille LaGuire</title>
		<link>http://mlouisalocke.com/2011/08/01/why-self-published-authors-know-best/#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Camille LaGuire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mlouisalocke.com/?p=685#comment-470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not sure I agree with everything you say, but this post has got me to thinking about agents and such, and I realized what&#039;s wrong with the approach of so many to the new world of publishing:

Most agents are asking the wrong question.  They&#039;re asking &quot;How can I fit what I do into this new world?&quot; - which is wrong because it makes them drag along all the baggage.  It makes them feel they have to come in as &quot;experts&quot; because that the role they were trying to fill before. (I say trying, because many were not succeeding.)  

The question they should be asking is: &quot;What do authors now need (regardless of whether it&#039;s something I have ever done before)?&quot;  To get any benefit out of that question, they&#039;re going to have to swallow their pride and let the authors take the lead.  And then when they have identified a real need, they can get themselves trained to create a NEW service.

Here&#039;s the thing: indie authors may or may not be experts in anything.  But they&#039;re for sure the only ones who know what they need and want.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure I agree with everything you say, but this post has got me to thinking about agents and such, and I realized what&#8217;s wrong with the approach of so many to the new world of publishing:</p>
<p>Most agents are asking the wrong question.  They&#8217;re asking &#8220;How can I fit what I do into this new world?&#8221; &#8211; which is wrong because it makes them drag along all the baggage.  It makes them feel they have to come in as &#8220;experts&#8221; because that the role they were trying to fill before. (I say trying, because many were not succeeding.)  </p>
<p>The question they should be asking is: &#8220;What do authors now need (regardless of whether it&#8217;s something I have ever done before)?&#8221;  To get any benefit out of that question, they&#8217;re going to have to swallow their pride and let the authors take the lead.  And then when they have identified a real need, they can get themselves trained to create a NEW service.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the thing: indie authors may or may not be experts in anything.  But they&#8217;re for sure the only ones who know what they need and want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Self-Published Authors Know Best by The Wisdom of the Self-Published Author &#171; Patrice Fitzgerald</title>
		<link>http://mlouisalocke.com/2011/08/01/why-self-published-authors-know-best/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Wisdom of the Self-Published Author &#171; Patrice Fitzgerald]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 02:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mlouisalocke.com/?p=685#comment-469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Louisa Locke wrote a post last August that describes, in great and careful detail, the advantages that those of us who are [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Louisa Locke wrote a post last August that describes, in great and careful detail, the advantages that those of us who are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Self-Published Authors Know Best by Patrice Fitzgerald</title>
		<link>http://mlouisalocke.com/2011/08/01/why-self-published-authors-know-best/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrice Fitzgerald]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 01:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mlouisalocke.com/?p=685#comment-468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a wonderful, encouraging but honest post!  I came here via the Passive Guy, who is always linking to the most interesting blogs.  

It was sometime last spring that I decided, mostly on the strength of David Gaughran and Joe Konrath&#039;s testimony, to go indie.  On the 4th of July I published my political thriller RUNNING, which has gone on to be a Kindle bestseller.  Awesome!

One of the most important benefits to me, along with all of the points you make above, is that the very freedom inherent in self-publishing... author control of cover, formatting, length, genre -- or lack of genre -- publication speed, direct reader feedback... is an impetus to creating MORE and BETTER work.  We are free to let the muse dance.  And that&#039;s good for readers as well as writers.

My favorite sentence from your post:  &quot;Once an author has been exposed to the liberating belief that all of their work can get in print, and all the work that is good, will get to be read, they will not go back to telling themselves that the gatekeepers were saving them from the awful mistake of publishing a bad book, and that the favorite quirky cross genre manuscript they wrote really is better off never being read by anyone.&quot;  

Thanks for putting this in words.

Viva la revolucion!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a wonderful, encouraging but honest post!  I came here via the Passive Guy, who is always linking to the most interesting blogs.  </p>
<p>It was sometime last spring that I decided, mostly on the strength of David Gaughran and Joe Konrath&#8217;s testimony, to go indie.  On the 4th of July I published my political thriller RUNNING, which has gone on to be a Kindle bestseller.  Awesome!</p>
<p>One of the most important benefits to me, along with all of the points you make above, is that the very freedom inherent in self-publishing&#8230; author control of cover, formatting, length, genre &#8212; or lack of genre &#8212; publication speed, direct reader feedback&#8230; is an impetus to creating MORE and BETTER work.  We are free to let the muse dance.  And that&#8217;s good for readers as well as writers.</p>
<p>My favorite sentence from your post:  &#8220;Once an author has been exposed to the liberating belief that all of their work can get in print, and all the work that is good, will get to be read, they will not go back to telling themselves that the gatekeepers were saving them from the awful mistake of publishing a bad book, and that the favorite quirky cross genre manuscript they wrote really is better off never being read by anyone.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Thanks for putting this in words.</p>
<p>Viva la revolucion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Self-Published Authors Know Best by Why Self-Published Authors Know Best &#124; The Passive Voice</title>
		<link>http://mlouisalocke.com/2011/08/01/why-self-published-authors-know-best/#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why Self-Published Authors Know Best &#124; The Passive Voice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mlouisalocke.com/?p=685#comment-467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to take risks, because they answer to no one but themselves and their readers.Link to the rest at M. Louisa LockeClick to Tweet/Email/Share This Post wpa2a.script_load();  Self-Publishing, Self-Publishing [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to take risks, because they answer to no one but themselves and their readers.Link to the rest at M. Louisa LockeClick to Tweet/Email/Share This Post wpa2a.script_load();  Self-Publishing, Self-Publishing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Self-Published Authors Know Best by Debra Holland</title>
		<link>http://mlouisalocke.com/2011/08/01/why-self-published-authors-know-best/#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Debra Holland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 17:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mlouisalocke.com/?p=685#comment-466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great article, thanks for laying out the points like you have.

I&#039;m a happily self-published author, with two books that didn&#039;t sell to traditional publishing because they&#039;re sweet historical Western romances. I&#039;ve sold 50,000 of those two books combined in nine and a half months, with number three selling great right out of the gate.

I think the idea of self-publishing sounds daunting to some traditional published authors. One told me last week that she didn&#039;t want to revisit her old books and update them. She wanted to focus on her new work. So she allowed her publisher to make them ebooks, and will now only receive a pittance on them. I cringed when I heard that, but it&#039;s her choice. And that&#039;s what&#039;s so wonderful about self-publishing. AUTHORS HAVE CHOICES. Every author&#039;s path is going to be different. That&#039;s why it&#039;s SO important to study the market (by reading articles like yours) and networking with other self-published authors.

I paid to have my books formatted and edited and for the covers, and I&#039;ve barely done any marketing. So it doesn&#039;t have to be a lot of hard work. Again, it&#039;s a choice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, thanks for laying out the points like you have.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a happily self-published author, with two books that didn&#8217;t sell to traditional publishing because they&#8217;re sweet historical Western romances. I&#8217;ve sold 50,000 of those two books combined in nine and a half months, with number three selling great right out of the gate.</p>
<p>I think the idea of self-publishing sounds daunting to some traditional published authors. One told me last week that she didn&#8217;t want to revisit her old books and update them. She wanted to focus on her new work. So she allowed her publisher to make them ebooks, and will now only receive a pittance on them. I cringed when I heard that, but it&#8217;s her choice. And that&#8217;s what&#8217;s so wonderful about self-publishing. AUTHORS HAVE CHOICES. Every author&#8217;s path is going to be different. That&#8217;s why it&#8217;s SO important to study the market (by reading articles like yours) and networking with other self-published authors.</p>
<p>I paid to have my books formatted and edited and for the covers, and I&#8217;ve barely done any marketing. So it doesn&#8217;t have to be a lot of hard work. Again, it&#8217;s a choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Free Victorian San Francisco Short Story by Just a quick word&#8230; &#124; &#124; VRChristensenVRChristensen</title>
		<link>http://mlouisalocke.com/2012/02/12/free-victorian-san-francisco-short-story/#comment-464</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Just a quick word&#8230; &#124; &#124; VRChristensenVRChristensen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 15:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mlouisalocke.com/?p=862#comment-464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] treatment. In no particular order, contributing authors will be N. Gemini Sasson, Rebecca Lochlann, M. Louisa Locke, Gev Sweeney (and myself, of course). Do stop by. I&#8217;m looking forward to some thought [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] treatment. In no particular order, contributing authors will be N. Gemini Sasson, Rebecca Lochlann, M. Louisa Locke, Gev Sweeney (and myself, of course). Do stop by. I&#8217;m looking forward to some thought [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

